InView Magazine: Issue 8 out now!
Do you know that 40 percent of senior executives fail within their first 18 months in a new role? It’s a sobering statistic. In legal departments, where 96 percent of leaders already struggle to find qualified talent, a failed senior legal hire typically costs two to three times their annual salary when you factor in recruitment, onboarding, lost productivity and replacement costs.
During my two decades working in executive search, I’ve seen brilliant lawyers thrive and equally talented ones crash spectacularly – often for entirely preventable reasons. The difference isn’t technical ability; it’s leadership capability and strategic mindset. When companies get the hiring process right – with honest role descriptions, swift feedback and clear leadership expectations – placements succeed. When they cut corners or rush the process, expensive failures follow.
Start with brutal honesty about what you actually need in a senior legal hire. Too many companies post generic job descriptions without thinking through fundamental questions: What strategic initiatives will this hire drive? How will they transform the legal function from a cost center to a business enabler? If this is a replacement role, what led to the previous person’s departure, and what leadership gaps need addressing? If it is a GC role, will the hire be on the board and report to the CEO? This reporting structure signals whether legal will be positioned as a strategic advisor or managed as a cost center.
I recall an occasion where I recruited a Senior Counsel initially described as “needing corporate law experience” to support M&A, governance and drafting contracts. After the individual started at the company, it became apparent that what they actually needed was someone to lead the vendor relationship strategy and oversee technology contract negotiations while managing a team of junior lawyers. The ideal candidate would have experience building legal operations in the tech industry, rather than a traditional corporate law background. The business had evolved rapidly, but the legal hiring hadn’t kept pace. What started as a need for traditional corporate support had shifted to operational legal challenges as the company scaled.
Another important point: get compensation right upfront. With lawyer unemployment at just 0.9 percent, you’re competing in a candidate’s market for proven legal talent. The most successful hiring managers survey stakeholders about current legal leadership gaps, map out succession planning and team development goals, and research competitive compensation before posting.
The biggest hiring mistake I see is confusing cultural fit with personal chemistry. True cultural fit for senior legal hires means evaluating how candidates lead teams, demonstrate gravitas and influence without authority, and navigate C-suite dynamics – not whether you’d grab drinks with them.
My evaluation approach involves asking specific behavioral questions during the initial screening interview and having candidates meet with company stakeholders. I ask them to describe their leadership philosophy and how they’ve built and maintained high-performing legal teams. I ask what their boss and peers would say are the best and worst aspects of working with them, and how they have influenced senior executives who disagreed with their legal recommendations. I also ask them to give examples of transforming legal department operations or culture. These questions reveal leadership patterns and strategic thinking that predict success far better than traditional interviews.
Complete all company interviews within three to four weeks. Remember, senior legal hires who are interviewing with you are often interviewing elsewhere – I’ve seen companies lose perfect fits by taking six weeks or more to make a decision. The best hiring managers have candidates meet C-suite executives and direct reports they’ll actually work with rather than just report to.
Red flags for candidates include companies rescheduling interviews more than once, interviewers who dismiss legitimate concerns about company challenges, and internal disagreements about leadership expectations. From the company side, watch for candidates who haven’t researched your business and don’t thoroughly understand the strategic role legal plays in your organization.
The most successful senior legal hires I’ve made follow a clear pattern in their first quarter. They focus on team assessment and stakeholder influence first, technical contributions second.
During days 1-30, thriving senior legal hires schedule one-on-ones with every C-suite executive, business unit head and their direct reports, ask about strategic priorities, risk tolerance and decision-making processes, and visit key business operations to understand revenue drivers. This “listen and learn” phase establishes their credibility as a strategic partner.
Days 31-60 involve assessing the team and process. Successful senior legal hires review existing processes, evaluate team capabilities and development needs, identify quick wins that demonstrate value, and consider whether the current team structure supports business growth.
The final phase, days 61-90, focuses on strategic planning and team development. Top performers present assessments of current team capabilities and strategic opportunities, propose six-month priorities aligned with business objectives and team development goals.
The most significant mindset shift involves transitioning from individual contributor to team leader and strategic advisor. Senior legal hires must influence without formal authority, understand the board’s risk appetite, manage up to skeptical executives, and build legal teams that can scale with business growth. Sometimes, the best legal advice is coaching business leaders through risk decisions rather than simply saying no. Successful candidates establish regular strategic sessions with executives, ask, “What are your biggest challenges right now?” and volunteer to lead cross-functional initiatives that showcase the business value of legal.
One successful placement, now a General Counsel, started attending weekly operations meetings and volunteered to lead the company’s M&A due diligence process. This positioned legal as a strategic partner rather than a gatekeeper, preventing a compliance issue that could have resulted in millions of dollars in damages.
For hiring managers: With 60 percent of in-house counsel actively job searching, you can’t afford legal hiring mistakes. Invest in leadership assessment, honest role representation regarding management expectations, and structured onboarding that includes team integration. The best senior legal talent often isn’t actively seeking new job opportunities, so consider a recruiter who can proactively target this talent pool.
For senior legal hires: Success requires more than just legal expertise. Prepare to discuss your leadership philosophy, team development approach and strategic vision for the legal function. Be prepared to demonstrate your ability to think like a business partner and team leader from day one. Remember that your success will be measured by the team you build, the strategic initiatives you lead, and the business problems you help solve as much as by the legal advice you provide.
For further information, go to pembrokesoames.com or https://www.linkedin.com/in/simondemeo
